| Abstract | Cilj ovoga istraživanja bio je ispitati korisnost Velepetorog modela ličnosti i Inventara ličnosti za DSM-5 u predviđanju odabira psihoterapijskog pristupa. U istraživanju je sudjelovalo 435 sudionika, 69,4 % ženskog spola i 29,2 % muškog spola, u dobi od 18 do 65 godina (M = 27,301; medijan C = 23 te Q1 = 21 i Q2 = 27). Podaci su prikupljani online, pomoću alata Google Obrazac. Korištena su pitanja o korištenju usluga psihoterapije i njihovom razumijevanju, hrvatski markeri Velepetorog modela ličnosti IPIP50S (Mlačić i Goldberg, 2007) te prijevod skraćene verzije Inventara ličnosti za DSM-5 (Mlačić, Milas i Andreis, osobna komunikacija). Rezultati hijerarhijske regresijske analize pokazali su da više razine dimenzije intelekta i ugodnosti te ženski spol i mlađa životna dob predviđaju preferenciju odlaska na psihodinamsku terapiju. Modelom je objašnjeno 16,2 % ukupne varijance kriterija. Rezultati hijerarhijske regresijske analize pokazali su da više razine dimenzije ugodnosti i psihoticizma, niže razine emocionalne stabilnosti te ženski spol značajno predviđaju preferenciju odlaska na geštalt terapiju te je tim modelom objašnjeno 8 % ukupne varijance kriterija. Što se tiče KBT-a, više razine dimenzije ugodnosti, negativne afektivnosti i perseveracije predviđaju preferenciju odlaska na KBT, s time da je modelom objašnjeno 5,3 % ukupne varijance kriterija. Preferenciju odlaska na realitetnu terapiju značajno predviđa ženski spol te viša razina dimenzije ugodnosti i niža razina dimenzije emocionalne stabilnosti. Modelom je objašnjeno 6,8 % ukupne varijance kriterija. Nalazi upućuju da je potrebno dublje istražiti povezanost Velepetorog modela ličnosti i Inventara ličnosti za DSM-5 sa psihoterapijskim pristupima. Dalje, potrebno je pobliže istražiti u kojoj mjeri je geštalt terapija primjerenija za osobe koje se nalaze više na dimenziji psihoticizma. Procjenjivanjem ličnosti prije tretmana bi se stvorila učinkovitija strategija planiranja i intervencija kod polaznika psihoterapija te bi se stvorila realna očekivanja o ishodima psihoterapije iz perspektive klijenta. |
| Abstract (english) | The aim of this study was to examine the utility of the Big Five Model of personality and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in predicting the choice of psychotherapeutic approach. The study included 435 participants, 69.4% female and 29.2% male, aged between 18 and 65 years (M = 27.301; median C = 23, Q1 = 21, and Q2 = 27). Data were collected online using Google Forms. The study utilized questions on the use and understanding of psychotherapy services, the Croatian markers of the Big Five Model of personality IPIP50S (Mlačić i Goldberg, 2007), and the translated short version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (Mlačić, Milas, i Andreis, personal communication). Results of the hierarchical regression analysis indicated that higher levels of Intellect and Agreeableness, as well as female gender and younger age, predicted a preference for psychodynamic therapy, with the model explaining 16.2% of the total variance in the criterion. The analysis also showed that higher levels of Agreeableness and Psychoticism, lower levels of Emotional Stability, and female gender significantly predicted a preference for Gestalt therapy, explaining 8% of the total variance. Regarding CBT, higher levels of Agreeableness, Negative Affectivity, and Perseveration predicted a preference for CBT, with the model explaining 5.3% of the total variance in the criterion. A preference for Reality Therapy was significantly predicted by female gender, higher levels of Agreeableness, and lower levels of Emotional Stability, with the model explaining 6.8% of the total variance. The findings suggest the need for further investigation into the relationship between the Big Five Model of personality and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 with psychotherapeutic approaches. Moreover, there is a need to explore the extent to which Gestalt therapy is more suitable for individuals higher on the Psychoticism dimension. Assessing personality before treatment would lead to a more effective strategy for planning and intervention in psychotherapy participants, creating realistic expectations about psychotherapy outcomes from the client's perspective. |
